Introduction:
In a recent development, the Federation of National Postal Organisations (FNPO) has raised concerns over the sudden cancellation of the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) for promotion to the cadre of PS Group 'B' for the vacancy years 2021, 2022, and 2023. The decision, made by the Department of Posts, has sparked controversy and calls for a review due to its ambiguous justification and potential inconsistencies in the application of rules across different circles.
Background:
The LDCE serves as a crucial avenue for employees aspiring for promotion within the Department of Posts. Candidates eagerly awaited the results of the LDCE held on 04.06.2023, only to be met with disappointment as the Department abruptly canceled the examination citing 'administrative reasons.' This move raised eyebrows within the postal community, prompting FNPO to intervene and seek clarity on the matter.
FNPO's Concerns:
In a letter addressed to the Director General Post, Department of Posts, FNPO Secretary General Sivaji Vasireddy expressed concerns regarding the lack of transparency surrounding the cancellation of the LDCE. The decision, labeled as being due to 'administrative reasons,' failed to provide concrete justification, leaving aspirants in limbo and raising questions about the fairness of the process.
Inconsistencies in Application:
FNPO's investigation revealed potential discrepancies in the application of rules across different postal circles. It came to light that certain circles had allowed candidates to appear in the LDCE, while others did not, based on the interpretation of rules regarding relaxation criteria. This non-uniform approach to administering the examination may have contributed to the Department's decision to cancel the LDCE.
Legal Implications and Call for Review:
FNPO's scrutiny of the situation led them to examine the relevant rules and regulations governing promotions to Group 'B' cadre within the Department of Posts. They highlighted the need to assess whether the alleged reason for cancellation, i.e., granting relaxation, indeed warranted such drastic action. FNPO urged the Department to review its decision in light of the prevailing rules and ensure uniformity in the application of criteria across all postal circles.
Conclusion:
The controversy surrounding the cancellation of the LDCE for promotion to PS Group 'B' cadre underscores the importance of transparency, fairness, and consistency in administrative processes within the Department of Posts. FNPO's proactive stance in seeking clarification and advocating for the rights of postal employees reflects its commitment to upholding the integrity of promotion procedures. Moving forward, a thorough review of the decision and adherence to established rules will be essential in restoring confidence and fairness in the promotion process within the postal service.
